Judge v. Rochester Fruit & Vegetable Co.
240 A.D. 757
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 15, 1933
StatusPublished
This text of 240 A.D. 757 (Judge v. Rochester Fruit & Vegetable Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Judge v. Rochester Fruit & Vegetable Co., 240 A.D. 757 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1933).
Opinion
Judgment and order reversed on the facts and a new trial granted, with costs to the appellant to abide the event on the ground that the damages awarded by the jury are excessive. All concur, except Thompson and Crosby, JJ., who dissent and vote for affirmance.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
240 A.D. 757, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/judge-v-rochester-fruit-vegetable-co-nyappdiv-1933.