Judge of the Co. Ct. v. Kerr

Supreme Court of Alabama

Judge of the Co. Ct. v. Kerr

17 Ala. 328

CourtSupreme Court of Alabama

DecidedJanuary 15, 1850

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 17 Ala. 328 (Judge of the Co. Ct. v. Kerr) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Judge of the Co. Ct. v. Kerr, 17 Ala. 328 (Ala. 1850).

Pincite

Opinion

DARGAN, C. J.

Mary R. Simpson filed a complaint before Alexander Russell, a justice of the peace of Limestone county, in which she charged that she had been delivered of a bastard child and that James H. Kerr was its father. A warrant issued on her complaint and Kerr entered into bond with security to appear before the County Court at the next term, and to abide and perform the order and decree that might be made by the court. An issue was made up and submitted to a jury to try the fact whether the defendant was the father of the bastard child; upon the trial of which it appeared that Mary It. Simpson was a married woman, but that her husband had abandoned her several years before the birth of the child. On this evidence, the court instructed the jury that if they believed that Mary R. Simpson was a married woman, they must find for the defendant, notwithstanding they might believe him to be the father of the child. The statute under which these proceedings were had evidently contemplates that a single woman alone can prefer a complaint of bastardy against one who may be the father of the bastard. The language of the act is— '“When any single woman who shall be pregnant or delivered of a child which by law would be considered a bastard, shall make complaint,” &c. As this statute is penal in its nature it-must be strictly construed, and a married woman cannot be permitted to prefer the complaint although she be delivered of a bastard during coverture. This construction was placed op ....... [330]*330the act by this court, in the case of Pruitt v. The Judge of the County Court, 16 Ala. 705.

It results from this view that there- is no error in the record, and the judgment .must be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DARGAN, C. J.

Mary R. Simpson filed a complaint before Alexander Russell, a justice of the peace of Limestone county, in which she charged that she had been delivered of a bastard child and that James H. Kerr was its father. A warrant issued on her complaint and Kerr entered into bond with security to appear before the County Court at the next term, and to abide and perform the order and decree that might be made by the court. An issue was made up and submitted to a jury to try the fact whether the defendant was the father of the bastard child; upon the trial of which it appeared that Mary It. Simpson was a married woman, but that her husband had abandoned her several years before the birth of the child. On this evidence, the court instructed the jury that if they believed that Mary R. Simpson was a married woman, they must find for the defendant, notwithstanding they might believe him to be the father of the child. The statute under which these proceedings were had evidently contemplates that a single woman alone can prefer a complaint of bastardy against one who may be the father of the bastard. The language of the act is— '“When any single woman who shall be pregnant or delivered of a child which by law would be considered a bastard, shall make complaint,” &c. As this statute is penal in its nature it-must be strictly construed, and a married woman cannot be permitted to prefer the complaint although she be delivered of a bastard during coverture. This construction was placed op ....... [330]*330the act by this court, in the case of Pruitt v. The Judge of the County Court, 16 Ala. 705.

It results from this view that there- is no error in the record, and the judgment .must be affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

17 Ala. 328, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/judge-of-the-co-ct-v-kerr-ala-1850.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack