Judge of Probate v. Tillotson
5 N.H. 413
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Judge of Probate v. Tillotson. Read the opinion of the Court — 6 N.H. 292 →
Opinion
The matter of the replication in this ease is very inartifieially alleged so far as it goes, and there is a defect in substance. It is not alleged that any .goods came to the hands of the administrator, and surely he was not bound to render an account, if he never received any thing. This is settled to be a fatal objection. 1 Pick. 20, Walker v. Hall ; 13 Johns. 437, The people v. Dunlop; 8 B. & C. 556 ; 2 Chitty’s Pl. 622.
And although the rejoinder is bad, yet it is a good answer to a bad replication.
Leave to amend...
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Judge of Probate v. Tillotson, 5 N.H. 413 (N.H. Super. Ct. 1831).
5 N.H. 413 (Judge of Probate v. Tillotson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Dunlap
13 Johns. 437 (New York Supreme Court, 1816)