Judge of Probate v. Emery

6 N.H. 141
Superior Court of New Hampshire·Decided March 15, 1833·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

By the court.

There are cases, in which a refusal to pay a debt, or a legacy, will not amount to a breach of the conditions of a common probate bond.

But we entertain no doubt, that a refusal, by an executor, to pay a legacy to which he has assented, is a breach of the condition of a bond to pay debts and legacies. 3 Mass. Rep. 252, Glover v. Heath; 3 N. H. Rep. 147, Claggett v. Hardy; 4 Pick. 380, White v. Stanwood; 6, ditto, 48, White v. Winchester; 9 Mass. Rep. 235, Lyman v. Clark; 14 ditto, 428, Prescott v. Parker; 9 ditto, 376, Prescott v. Petts; 4 ditto, 208, Dawes v. Swan.

Judgment for the plaintiff.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judge of Probate v. Emery, 6 N.H. 141 (N.H. Super. Ct. 1833).

6 N.H. 141 (Judge of Probate v. Emery) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Judge of Probate v. Kimball
12 N.H. 165 (Superior Court of New Hampshire, 1841)
Judge of Probate v. Locke
6 N.H. 396 (Superior Court of New Hampshire, 1833)