Judge of Probate v. Briggs

3 N.H. 309
Superior Court of New Hampshire·Decided October 15, 1825·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

By the court.

The court of probate is not a court of record, in the common law sense of the terms ; yet it has always been the custom to keep a record of all its proceedings. And we are clearly of opinion, that parol evidence is [310]*310not admissible to prove a decision in that court, in order to bar a claim, which would otherwise seem to be founded in justice. There is much good sense in the remarks of Parker, C. J. in the case of Chase vs. Hathaway, (14 Mass. Rep. 222,) on the subject of probate records ; and we have no hesitation in ordering, that there be, in this case,

Judgment on the verdict.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judge of Probate v. Briggs, 3 N.H. 309 (N.H. Super. Ct. 1825).

3 N.H. 309 (Judge of Probate v. Briggs) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dudley v. Butler
10 N.H. 281 (Superior Court of New Hampshire, 1839)
Judge of Probate v. Briggs
5 N.H. 66 (Superior Court of New Hampshire, 1829)
Bean v. Burleigh
4 N.H. 550 (Superior Court of New Hampshire, 1829)