Judd v. Van Cortland
This text of 5 Sarat. Ch. Sent. 9 (Judd v. Van Cortland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Chancery primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Decree and order of the late vice chancellor of the seventh circuit reversed; and a decree directed to be entered declaring that the complainant’s mortgage is the prior lien upon the premises; that he is entitled to a preference in payment out of the proceeds of the sale of the mortgaged premises ; and that the representatives of Van Cortland have also an equitable claim upon the premises for the amount due [64]*64on the bond and mortgage to Van Cortland. Reference to a master directed, to inquire and report the amount due to the complainant, and to the representatives of Van Cortland. Decree also to direct a sale of the premises, and for the payment to complainant of the amount reported due to him with interest and costs, out of the proceeds ; and that the residue of the proceeds of the sale be applied • to the payment of the amount reported due to the representatives of Van Cortland, with interest from date of report-; with liberty to such representatives to proceed either at law or in equity against the-defendant Wendell for the deficiency, if any.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
5 Sarat. Ch. Sent. 9, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/judd-v-van-cortland-nychanct-1846.