Judd v. Trustees of Manhattan & Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority Pension Plan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Judd v. Trustees of Manhattan & Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority Pension Plan

288 A.D.2d 385, 732 N.Y.S.2d 894, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11246

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 19, 2001

StatusPublished

This text of 288 A.D.2d 385 (Judd v. Trustees of Manhattan & Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority Pension Plan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Judd v. Trustees of Manhattan & Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority Pension Plan, 288 A.D.2d 385, 732 N.Y.S.2d 894, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11246 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

—In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the Trustees of Manhattan and Bronx Surface Operating Authority Pension Plan dated June 23, 1999, which denied the petitioner’s accident disability retirement benefits, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Held, J.), dated June 27, 2000, which denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly determined that the respondent’s determination denying accidental disability retirement to the petitioner was not arbitrary or capricious. The petition[386]*386er’s injuries resulted solely from the performance of her usual duties (see, Matter of Kehoe v City of New York, 81 NY2d 815). Altman, J. P., H. Miller, Feuerstein and Cozier, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the Trustees of Manhattan and Bronx Surface Operating Authority Pension Plan dated June 23, 1999, which denied the petitioner’s accident disability retirement benefits, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Held, J.), dated June 27, 2000, which denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly determined that the respondent’s determination denying accidental disability retirement to the petitioner was not arbitrary or capricious. The petition[386]*386er’s injuries resulted solely from the performance of her usual duties (see, Matter of Kehoe v City of New York, 81 NY2d 815). Altman, J. P., H. Miller, Feuerstein and Cozier, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

288 A.D.2d 385, 732 N.Y.S.2d 894, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11246, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/judd-v-trustees-of-manhattan-bronx-surface-transit-operating-authority-nyappdiv-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack