Judd v. Cralle

Appellate Court of Illinois

Judd v. Cralle

37 Ill. App. 149, 1890 Ill. App. LEXIS 143

DecidedJune 30, 1890

StatusPublished

This text of 37 Ill. App. 149 (Judd v. Cralle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Judd v. Cralle, 37 Ill. App. 149, 1890 Ill. App. LEXIS 143 (Ill. Ct. App. 1890).

Pincite

Opinion

Garnett, J.

This action was begun before a justice of the peace, and from his judgment in favor of the plaintiff an appeal was taken to the Superior Court, where the case was tried by the court without a jury; judgment was again rendered for the plaintiff, and the defendant appeals.

The suit was on a promissory note, to which there appeared the signature of Judd & Hill. Appellant contends that he did not make or authorize the making thereof. Having failed to deny the execution by affidavit he is barred from this defense even where the action was brought before a justice. Griswold v. Trustees of Peoria University, 26 Ill. 41; Zuel v. Bowen, 78 Ill. 234; Hudson v. Dickinson, 12 Ill. 407; Evans v. Fisher, 5 Gilm. 569; Foy v. Blackstone, 31 Ill. 538.

Being estopped to deny the execution of the note, there is no place in the case for the statute of limitations, as the plaintiff is not obliged to rely upon the original consideration as a cause of action.

The judgment is affirmed. Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI