Juchniewicz v. Bridgeport Hospital
866 A.2d 1287, 272 Conn. 917, 2005 Conn. LEXIS 31
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedJanuary 20, 2005
DocketSC 17345
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases
This text of 866 A.2d 1287 (Juchniewicz v. Bridgeport Hospital) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Juchniewicz v. Bridgeport Hospital, 866 A.2d 1287, 272 Conn. 917, 2005 Conn. LEXIS 31 (Colo. 2005).
Opinion
The named plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 86 Conn. App. 310 (AC 23877), is granted, limited to the following issues:
“1. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the named plaintiff was not entitled to a jury charge that the named plaintiffs decedent was presumed to be in the exercise of reasonable care, pursuant to General Statutes § 52-114?
“2. If the answer to the first question is ‘no,’ was the error harmful?”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Juchniewicz v. Bridgeport Hospital
914 A.2d 511 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2007)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
866 A.2d 1287, 272 Conn. 917, 2005 Conn. LEXIS 31, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/juchniewicz-v-bridgeport-hospital-conn-2005.