Juba v. General Builders Supply Corp.

284 A.D. 891, 134 N.Y.S.2d 592, 1954 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3970
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 4, 1954·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, appellant moved, under subdivision 6 of rule 109 of the Rules of Civil Practice to strike the affirmative defense from respondent’s answer as insufficient in law. The defense is to the effect that the appellant is not the real party in interest, his cause of action against a third person having been assigned by operation of statute on September 2, 1950, as provided by section 29 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law (as amd. by L. 1947, ehs. 9, 144, and as it existed prior [892] to amendment by L. 1951, eh. 527). The motion was denied. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. (Olker v. Salomone, 283 App. Div. 948.) Leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied. (Olker v. Salomone, 283 App. Div. 1103.) Nolan, P. J., Adel, Schmidt, Beldock and Murphy, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Juba v. General Builders Supply Corp., 284 A.D. 891, 134 N.Y.S.2d 592, 1954 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3970 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1954).

284 A.D. 891 (Juba v. General Builders Supply Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Juba v. General Builders Supply Corp.
6 A.D.2d 839 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1958)
Peritore v. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp.
4 Misc. 2d 202 (New York Supreme Court, 1956)