Juarez v. United States Postal Service
This text of Juarez v. United States Postal Service (Juarez v. United States Postal Service) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, M.D. Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION
JUAN JUAREZ,
Plaintiff,
v. Case No: 6:23-cv-1573-JSS-DCI
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant. ___________________________________/ ORDER Plaintiff has filed a Notice of Voluntary Dismissal with Prejudice, (Dkt. 30), in which he purports to voluntarily dismiss his claim with prejudice “against Defendant, UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE,” pursuant to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.420. However, the United States Postal Service has been terminated as a Defendant in this matter, leaving the United States the sole remaining Defendant. (See Dkts. 17, 20.) Moreover, because this case is pending in federal court, voluntary dismissal is controlled by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a). Further still, because Defendant has filed an answer, (Dkt. 21), and because the notice is not signed by “all parties who have appeared,” Plaintiff’s notice is ineffective to voluntarily dismiss this action. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A); PTA-FLA, Inc. v. ZTE USA, Inc., 844 F.3d 1299, 1307 (11th Cir. 2016) (“According to the plain text of Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i), only the filing of an answer or a motion for summary judgment terminates a plaintiff’s ability to voluntarily dismiss its claim without a court order.”); City of Jacksonville v. Jacksonville Hosp. Holdings, L.P., 82 F.4th 1031, 1034 (11th Cir. 2023) (“Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) . . . permits a plaintiff to dismiss an action without a court order by filing ‘a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who have appeared.’”’) (quoting Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i1)). If Plaintiff wishes to voluntarily dismiss this action, he may either file a joint “stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who have appeared,” Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i1) (emphasis added), or file a motion under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2). ORDERED in Orlando, Florida, on February 28, 2025.
YY Ae tie JULIE S. SNEED UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Copies furnished to: Counsel of Record
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Juarez v. United States Postal Service, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/juarez-v-united-states-postal-service-flmd-2025.