Home/Ninth Circuit/Juarez v. I.N.S.

Juarez v. I.N.S.

95 F.3d 1157, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 38437, 1996 WL 459920
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided August 13, 1996·No. 95-70178·Unpublished

Opinion

95 F.3d 1157

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
Alfonso Rutilio JUAREZ; Azyadee Orgonez De Juarez; Alfonso
Rutilio Juarez, Jr; Emilio Antonio Juarez; Erick
Antonio Juarez, Petitioners,
v.
IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent.

No. 95-70178.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Aug. 8, 1996.*
Decided Aug. 13, 1996.

Before: D.W. NELSON, T.G. NELSON, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM**

We AFFIRM on the basis of the reasoning of the Board of Immigration Appeals' decision.

*

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed.R.App.P. 34(a) and Ninth Circuit Rule 34-4

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Juarez v. I.N.S., 95 F.3d 1157, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 38437, 1996 WL 459920 (9th Cir. 1996).

95 F.3d 1157 (Juarez v. I.N.S.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.