Juarez v. Burger King 22

638 So. 2d 623, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 6533, 1994 WL 313732
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 5, 1994·No. No. 92-2006·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We have for review an order of the judge of compensation claims determining that the claim of Marina Juarez for workers’ compensation benefits is barred for failure to file the claim within two years of her industrial accident. See § 440.19(l)(a), Fla.Stat. (1985). We formerly noted that section 440.19’s two-year limitations period “does not commence until a reasonable person would recognize ‘the nature, seriousness and probable com-pensable character of his injury or disease.’ ” Paulk v. Berkeley Florist Supply, 574 So.2d 238, 240 (Fla. 1st DCA) (citation omitted), review denied, 584 So.2d 997 (Fla.1991). We therefore remand this case for the determination required by Paulk.

It is so ordered.

ALLEN, WEBSTER and LAWRENCE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Juarez v. Burger King 22, 638 So. 2d 623, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 6533, 1994 WL 313732 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

638 So. 2d 623 (Juarez v. Burger King 22) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Paulk v. Berkeley Florist Supply
574 So. 2d 238 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)