Juanita Garofalo v. Dallas Area Rapid Transit

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided June 2, 2014·No. 05-13-01595-CV·Published

Opinion

Order entered June 2, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-13-01595-CV

JUANITA GAROFALO, Appellant V.

DALLAS AREA RAPID TRANSIT, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5 Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CC-13-03116-E

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s May 22, 2014 motion to correct and file complete clerk’s

record and second motion for extension of time to file brief. In her motion, appellant, who is appearing pro se, identifies “a few” documents missing from the clerk’s record and requests the Court “direct the Clerks of all courts in which this case has been docketed to compile a complete record of the case and file it immediately.” Appellant also requests the deadline for filing her brief, which was due May 23, 2014, be extended to thirty days from the filing of the complete clerk’s record.

Because appellant has failed to provide a complete list of all the items omitted from the record, we DENY her request to direct the clerk to file a supplemental clerk’s record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 34.5(b)(2). We GRANT appellant’s extension motion to the extent we ORDER the brief be filed no later than July 11, 2014. In accordance with rule of appellate procedure 34.5, appellant shall file directly with the trial court clerk any request for a supplemental clerk’s record no later than June 5, 2014. See TEX. R. APP. P. 34.5(b)(2), (c). Appellant is cautioned that no further extensions will be granted absent exigent circumstances.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS JUSTICE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Juanita Garofalo v. Dallas Area Rapid Transit, (Tex. Ct. App. 2014).

Juanita Garofalo v. Dallas Area Rapid Transit (Juanita Garofalo v. Dallas Area Rapid Transit) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.