Juan Yenell Vazquez v. the State of Texas
This text of Juan Yenell Vazquez v. the State of Texas (Juan Yenell Vazquez v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NUMBER 13-22-00459-CR
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG
JUAN YENELL VAZQUEZ, Appellant,
v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.
On appeal from the 36th District Court of San Patricio County, Texas.
ORDER OF ABATEMENT Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Longoria and Silva Order Per Curiam
This cause is before the Court on appellant Juan Yenell Vazquez’s motion to
amend trial court’s certification of defendant’s right of appeal and motion for leave to file
the same. On September 22, 2022, appellant filed a notice of appeal attempting to appeal
a judgment revoking community supervision in trial court cause number S-19-
3037CR. The trial court’s certification of the defendant’s right to appeal indicates this is a plea-bargain case, and the defendant has no right of appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P.
25.2(a)(2). However, the motion to revoke was heard as a contested matter by the trial
court.
Upon review, we have determined the trial court’s certification of appellant’s right
of appeal is incorrect or otherwise defective. See Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610, 614-
15 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005); see Tex. R. App. P. 34.5(c); 37.1. A defective certification
includes a certification that is correct in form, but, when compared with the record before
the court, proves to be inaccurate. Dears, 154 S.W.3d at 614.
Therefore, we carry appellant’s motion to amend trial court’s certification of
defendant’s right of appeal and grant the motion for leave. Further, we abate and remand
this case to the trial court. The trial court shall cause a hearing to be held to determine:
(1) whether the trial court’s certification of appealability is correct; (2) whether the
appellant has the right of appeal; and (3) whether appellant has abandoned the
appeal. We further direct the trial court to issue findings of fact and conclusions of law
regarding these issues. The trial court’s amended certification, if any, and any orders it
enters shall be included in a supplemental clerk’s record. The trial court is directed to
cause a supplemental clerk’s record and supplemental reporter’s record to be filed with
the Clerk of this Court within thirty days of the date of this order.
PER CURIAM
Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
Delivered and filed on the 11th day of January, 2023.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Juan Yenell Vazquez v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/juan-yenell-vazquez-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2023.