JUAN WHIPPLE v. CRYSTAL F. DAWSON

Opinion

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Opinion filed July 14, 2021.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D20-1250

Lower Tribunal No. 20-8975

________________

Juan Whipple,

Appellant,

vs.

Crystal F. Dawson, et al., Appellees.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Reemberto Diaz, Judge.

Juan Whipple, in proper person.

William C. Robinson, for appellees.

Before SCALES, MILLER and LOBREE, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Sunset Harbour Condo. Ass’n v. Robbins, 914 So. 2d

2

925, 928 (Fla. 2005) (“In order to be preserved for further review by a higher court, an issue must be presented to the lower court and the specific legal argument or ground to be argued on appeal or review must be part of that presentation if it is to be considered preserved.” (quoting Tillman v. State, 471 So. 2d 32, 35 (Fla.1985))); Rose v. Clements, 973 So. 2d 529, 530 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007) (“Any basis for reversal of summary judgment must be preserved by raising the issue in the trial court.”); Rose v. Hansell, 929 So. 2d 22, 24 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006) (explaining that appellant is “required to provide an adequate record to support his appeal, and it is his burden to demonstrate error”).