JUAN WHIPPLE v. CRYSTAL F. DAWSON

• Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida
• Decided: July 14, 2021
• Docket: 20-1250
• Status: Published

Opinion

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Opinion filed July 14, 2021. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D20-1250 Lower Tribunal No. 20-8975 ________________

Juan Whipple, Appellant,

vs.

Crystal F. Dawson, et al., Appellees.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Reemberto Diaz, Judge.

Juan Whipple, in proper person.

William C. Robinson, for appellees.

Before SCALES, MILLER and LOBREE, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Sunset Harbour Condo. Ass’n v. Robbins, 914 So. 2d 925, 928 (Fla. 2005) (“In order to be preserved for further review by a higher

court, an issue must be presented to the lower court and the specific legal

argument or ground to be argued on appeal or review must be part of that

presentation if it is to be considered preserved.” (quoting Tillman v. State,

471 So. 2d 32, 35 (Fla.1985))); Rose v. Clements, 973 So. 2d 529, 530 (Fla.

1st DCA 2007) (“Any basis for reversal of summary judgment must be

preserved by raising the issue in the trial court.”); Rose v. Hansell, 929 So.

2d 22, 24 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006) (explaining that appellant is “required to

provide an adequate record to support his appeal, and it is his burden to

demonstrate error”).