Juan Torres-Vasquez v. William Barr

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 10 2020 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JUAN DAVID TORRES-VASQUEZ, No. 19-71560 Petitioner, Agency No. A203-290-712

v.

MEMORANDUM*

WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted June 2, 2020**

Before: LEAVY, PAEZ, and BENNETT, Circuit Judges.

Juan David Torres-Vasquez, a native and citizen of Colombia, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying a waiver of inadmissibility. We dismiss the petition for review.

We lack jurisdiction to review the agency’s discretionary decision denying a

*

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

**

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

waiver of inadmissibility under 8 U.S.C. § 1182(h)(1)(B), where Torres-Vasquez does not raise a colorable due process claim or question of law. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(B)(i); Mendoza v. Holder, 623 F.3d 1299, 1302 (9th Cir. 2010). We also lack jurisdiction to review Torres-Vasquez’s unexhausted contention that the IJ should have allowed him additional opportunity to submit corroborating evidence. See Tijani v. Holder, 628 F.3d 1071, 1080 (9th Cir. 2010) (the court “lack[s] jurisdiction to review legal claims not presented in an alien’s administrative proceedings before the BIA.”).

Torres-Vasquez’s motion for a stay of removal is denied as moot.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.

2 19-71560