Juan Salinas v. State
Opinion
NUMBER 13-10-00014-CR
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
JUAN SALINAS, Appellant,
v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.
On appeal from the 36th District Court of San Patricio County, Texas.
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Rodriguez, Benavides, and Vela Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam
Appellant, Juan Salinas, attempts to appeal his conviction for burglary of a
habitation. The trial court has certified that this Ais a plea-bargain case, and the
defendant has NO right of appeal@ and that Athe defendant has waived the right of
appeal.@ See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). On January 11, 2010, this Court notified appellant=s counsel of the trial court=s
certification and ordered counsel to: (1) review the record; (2) determine whether
appellant has a right to appeal; and (3) forward to this Court, by letter, counsel=s findings
as to whether appellant has a right to appeal, or, alternatively, advise this Court as to the
existence of any amended certification.
On May 12, 2010, the case was abated to the trial court for a status of appeal
hearing at which time the trial court clarified that it had not granted permission to appeal.
Counsel subsequently filed a letter brief with this Court. Counsel=s response does not
establish that the certification currently on file with this Court is incorrect or that appellant
otherwise has a right to appeal.
The Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provide that an appeal must be
dismissed if the trial court=s certification does not show that the defendant has the right of
appeal. TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d); see TEX. R. APP. P. 37.1, 44.3, 44.4. Accordingly, this
appeal is DISMISSED. Any pending motions are denied as moot.
PER CURIAM
Do not publish. See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
Delivered and filed the 29th day of June, 2010.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Juan Salinas v. State (Juan Salinas v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.