Juan Rodriguez v. Joseph Page

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided January 30, 2019·No. 17-2680·Unpublished

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________

No. 17-2680 ___________________________

Juan Carlos Rodriguez

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant

v.

Joseph Page, "Joe," Assistant Warden, Grimes Unit, ADC; Melvin Nance, Doctor, Grimes Unit, Arkansas Department of Correction; Aundrea Weekly, Warden, Grimes Unit, Arkansas Department of Correction (originally named as Andrea Weekly); Brenda Bridgeman, RN, Medical Supervisor, C.C.S. (originally named as Brenda Bridgmen)

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees ____________

Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Batesville ____________

Submitted: January 24, 2019 Filed: January 30, 2019 [Unpublished] ____________

Before BENTON, BOWMAN, and STRAS, Circuit Judges. ____________

PER CURIAM. Arkansas inmate Juan Carlos Rodriguez appeals from the order of the District 1 Court granting summary judgment to defendants in his action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and the Americans with Disabilities Act. Viewing the record in the light most favorable to Rodriguez and drawing all reasonable inferences in his favor, we conclude that summary judgment was warranted. See Peterson v. Kopp, 754 F.3d 594, 598 (8th Cir. 2014) (standard of review). We affirm. ______________________________

1 The Honorable Brian S. Miller, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Patricia S. Harris, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Juan Rodriguez v. Joseph Page, (8th Cir. 2019).

Juan Rodriguez v. Joseph Page (Juan Rodriguez v. Joseph Page) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Robert Aaron Peterson v. Officer Michael Kopp
754 F.3d 594 (Eighth Circuit, 2014)