Juan Munoz v. Katoen Natie Gulf Coast, Inc.
Opinion
Opinion issued November 4, 2025
In The
Court of Appeals
For The
First District of Texas
September 23, 2025 order and requesting that the appeal “be dismissed.” We construe appellant’s October 13, 2025 letter as a motion to dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1) (permitting voluntary dismissal of appeal on motion of appellant).
No other party has filed a notice of appeal, and no opinion has issued. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1), (c). Appellant’s motion does not include a certificate of conference stating that appellant conferred with appellee regarding the merits of the motion and whether appellee is opposed to the requested relief. See TEX. R. APP. P. 10.1(a)(5). However, more than ten days have passed, and no party has opposed the relief requested by appellant’s motion. See TEX. R. APP. P.10.3(a)(2).
Accordingly, the Court grants appellant’s motion and dismisses the appeal.
See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f). We dismiss all other pending motions as moot.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Rivas-Molloy, Gunn, and Caughey.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Juan Munoz v. Katoen Natie Gulf Coast, Inc. (Juan Munoz v. Katoen Natie Gulf Coast, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.