Juan Mendoza-Mejia v. Michael Mukasey

350 F. App'x 85
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedNovember 3, 2009
Docket08-2880
StatusUnpublished

This text of 350 F. App'x 85 (Juan Mendoza-Mejia v. Michael Mukasey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Juan Mendoza-Mejia v. Michael Mukasey, 350 F. App'x 85 (8th Cir. 2009).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Juan Mendoza-Mejia, a citizen of Guatemala, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. Because substantial evidence supports the Board’s determination that Mendoza-Mejia was not subjected to past persecution and does not have a well-founded fear of future persecution in Guatemala, we deny review of Mendoza-Mejia’s claims for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture. See Zacarias-Velasquez v. Mukasey, 509 F.3d 429, 432-34 (8th Cir.2007); Gitimu v. Holder, 581 F.3d 769, 774 (8th Cir.2009). Because this court lacks jurisdiction to review the Board’s determination that Mendoza-Mejia failed to prove his removal would cause an exceptional and extremely unusual hardship to his spouse or child under 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b)(l)(D), we also deny review of his claim for cancellation of removal. See Zacarias-Velasquez, 509 F.3d at 434. Accordingly, Mendoza-Mejia’s petition is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Zacarias-Velasquez v. Mukasey
509 F.3d 429 (Eighth Circuit, 2007)
Gitimu v. Holder
581 F.3d 769 (Eighth Circuit, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
350 F. App'x 85, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/juan-mendoza-mejia-v-michael-mukasey-ca8-2009.