Juan Mendoza-Mejia v. Michael Mukasey
This text of 350 F. App'x 85 (Juan Mendoza-Mejia v. Michael Mukasey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Juan Mendoza-Mejia, a citizen of Guatemala, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. Because substantial evidence supports the Board’s determination that Mendoza-Mejia was not subjected to past persecution and does not have a well-founded fear of future persecution in Guatemala, we deny review of Mendoza-Mejia’s claims for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture. See Zacarias-Velasquez v. Mukasey, 509 F.3d 429, 432-34 (8th Cir.2007); Gitimu v. Holder, 581 F.3d 769, 774 (8th Cir.2009). Because this court lacks jurisdiction to review the Board’s determination that Mendoza-Mejia failed to prove his removal would cause an exceptional and extremely unusual hardship to his spouse or child under 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b)(l)(D), we also deny review of his claim for cancellation of removal. See Zacarias-Velasquez, 509 F.3d at 434. Accordingly, Mendoza-Mejia’s petition is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
350 F. App'x 85, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/juan-mendoza-mejia-v-michael-mukasey-ca8-2009.