Juan Mateo Hurtado v. Rachel Magee

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedSeptember 3, 2020
Docket05-20-00612-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Juan Mateo Hurtado v. Rachel Magee (Juan Mateo Hurtado v. Rachel Magee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Juan Mateo Hurtado v. Rachel Magee, (Tex. Ct. App. 2020).

Opinion

Dismiss and Opinion Filed September 3, 2020

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-20-00612-CV

JUAN MATEO HURTADO, Appellant V. RACHEL MAGEE, Appellee

On Appeal from the 44th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-17-14887

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Myers, Nowell, and Evans Opinion by Justice Myers The filing fee, docketing statement, and clerk’s record in this case are past

due. By postcard dated June 17, 2020, we notified appellant the $205 filing fee was

due. We directed appellant to remit the filing fee within ten days and expressly

cautioned appellant that failure to do so would result in dismissal of the appeal. Also

by postcard dated June 17, 2020, we informed appellant the docketing statement in

this case was due. We cautioned appellant that failure to file the docketing statement

within ten days might result in the dismissal of this appeal without further notice.

By letter dated July 23, 2020, we informed appellant the clerk’s record had not been filed because appellant had not paid for the clerk’s record. We directed appellant to

provide, within ten days, (1) verification of payment or arrangements to pay for the

clerk’s record, or (2) written documentation that appellant had been found entitled

to proceed without payment of costs. We cautioned appellant that failure to do so

would result in the dismissal of this appeal without further notice. To date, appellant

has not paid the filing fee, provided the required documentation, or otherwise

corresponded with the Court regarding the status of this appeal.

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b); 42.3(b), (c).

/Lana Myers/ LANA MYERS JUSTICE

200612F.P05

–2– Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT

JUAN MATEO HURTADO, On Appeal from the 44th Judicial Appellant District Court, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-17-14887. No. 05-20-00612-CV V. Opinion delivered by Justice Myers. Justices Nowell and Evans RACHEL MAGEE, Appellee participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED.

It is ORDERED that appellee RACHEL MAGEE recover her costs of this appeal from appellant JUAN MATEO HURTADO.

Judgment entered this 3rd day of September, 2020.

–3–

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Juan Mateo Hurtado v. Rachel Magee, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/juan-mateo-hurtado-v-rachel-magee-texapp-2020.