Juan Manuel Vela, D/B/A Candlelight Agency v. the Lamar Companies

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedAugust 27, 2004
Docket13-04-00373-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Juan Manuel Vela, D/B/A Candlelight Agency v. the Lamar Companies (Juan Manuel Vela, D/B/A Candlelight Agency v. the Lamar Companies) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Juan Manuel Vela, D/B/A Candlelight Agency v. the Lamar Companies, (Tex. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion



NUMBER 13-04-373-CV


COURT OF APPEALS


THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS


CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

___________________________________________________________________


JUAN MANUEL VELA, D/B/A CANDLELIGHT AGENCY,         Appellant,


v.


THE LAMAR COMPANIES,                                                  Appellee.

___________________________________________________________________


On appeal from the 347th District Court

of Nueces County, Texas

___________________________________________________________________


MEMORANDUM OPINION


Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Hinojosa, and Castillo

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam


         Appellant, JUAN MANUEL VELA, D/B/A CANDLELIGHT AGENCY, attempted to perfect an appeal from a judgment entered by the 347th District Court of Nueces County, Texas, in cause number 03-6951-H. Judgment in this cause was signed on May 12, 2004. No timely motion for new trial was filed. Pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 26.1, appellant’s notice of appeal was due on June 11, 2004, but was not filed until June 15, 2004.

         Notice of this defect was given so that steps could be taken to correct the defect, if it could be done. Appellant was advised that, if the defect was not corrected within ten days from the date of receipt of this Court’s letter, the appeal would be dismissed. To date, no response has been received from appellant.

         The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file, appellant’s failure to timely perfect his appeal, and appellant’s failure to respond to this Court’s notice, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. The appeal is hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION.

                                                               PER CURIAM



Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed this

the 27th day of August, 2004.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Juan Manuel Vela, D/B/A Candlelight Agency v. the Lamar Companies, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/juan-manuel-vela-dba-candlelight-agency-v-the-lama-texapp-2004.