Juan Manuel Castillo, Jr. v. Warden FCI Three Rivers

• Court: District Court, S.D. Texas
• Decided: November 19, 2025
• Docket: 2:25-cv-00192
• Status: Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT November 19, 2025 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS Nathan Ochsner, Clerk CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION

JUAN MANUEL CASTILLO, JR., § § Petitioner, § § VS. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:25-CV-00192 § WARDEN FCI THREE RIVERS, § § Respondent. §

ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE On October 17, 2025, United States Magistrate Judge Mitchel Neurock issued his “Memorandum and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge” (D.E. 9), recommending that this action be dismissed as improperly filed as a habeas corpus action. The parties were provided proper notice of, and opportunity to object to, the Magistrate Judge’s memorandum and recommendation. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); General Order No. 2002-13. No objections have been timely filed. When no timely objection to a magistrate judge’s memorandum and recommendation is filed, the district court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record and accept the magistrate judge’s memorandum and recommendation. Guillory v. PPG Indus., Inc., 434 F.3d 303, 308 (5th Cir. 2005) (citing Douglass v. United Servs. Auto Ass’n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1420 (5th Cir. 1996)). Having reviewed the findings of fact and conclusions of law set forth in the Magistrate Judge’s memorandum and recommendation (D.E. 9), and all other relevant documents in the record, and finding no clear error, the Court ADOPTS as its own the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, this actionis DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as improperly filed in the form of a habeas corpus proceeding. ORDERED on November 19, 2025. fel GONZAIGS RAMOS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2/2