Juan MacEdo v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided November 14, 2019·No. 14-19-00386-CR·Published

Opinion

Motion Denied and Order filed November 14, 2019

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-19-00386-CR

JUAN MACEDO, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 184th District Court Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1494135

ORDER

Appellant filed a motion requesting we direct the district clerk to supplement the clerk’s record. The motion attaches an email conversation between appellant’s lawyer and a deputy district clerk. The lawyer’s email identifies the document she wants to be included in the clerk’s record and concludes, “Can you please file a supplement with the record with the 14th COA?” The clerk’s response states in relevant part, “You will have to file a request to supplement the clerk’s record first. Once filed, I can supplement the record containing the said document.” Appellant’s motion asserts the clerk will not supplement the record without a court order and asks us to issue such an order.

We disagree with appellant’s construction of the clerk’s response. It appears the clerk was indicating the lawyer’s email did not suffice as a formal request for supplementation under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 34.5(c)(1).

Because we have no reason to believe the clerk will not supplement the record once a proper request is received, we deny the motion.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Wise, Jewell, and Poissant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Juan MacEdo v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2019).

Juan MacEdo v. State (Juan MacEdo v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.