Juan M. Trevino v. Department of the Army
Opinion
52 F.3d 342
NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order.
Juan M. TREVINO, Petitioner,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF the ARMY, Respondent.
No. 95-3040.
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
Feb. 17, 1995.
ON MOTION
ORDER
Juan M. Trevino's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis having been granted,
IT IS ORDERED THAT:
(1) The court's December 1, 1994 dismissal order is vacated, the December 1, 1994 mandate is recalled, and Trevino's petition for review is reinstated.
(2) The Army should compute the time for filing its brief from the date of filing of this order.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
52 F.3d 342 (Juan M. Trevino v. Department of the Army) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.