Juan Jose Garcia v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided September 13, 2018·No. 01-18-00381-CR·Published

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION

Cause number: 01-18-00381-CR Style: Juan Jose Garcia v. The State of Texas Date motions filed*: September 4 and 6, 2018 Type of motion: Motions for Access to Appellate Record for Pro Se Anders Response Party filing motions: Pro Se Appellant Juan Jose Garcia Document to be filed: Appellant’s Notice to Appellant

Is appeal accelerated? No.

Ordered that motion is: ☐Granted  Denied ☒ Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot)  Other: _____________________________________ This Court’s August 31, 2018 Memorandum Opinion and Judgment dismissed this appeal for want of jurisdiction as untimely. Thus, appellant’s pro se motions for access to the appellate record are dismissed as moot. Appointed counsel still has a duty to inform appellant of the result of this appeal by sending a copy of this Court’s Opinion and Judgment and this Order to appellant and informing him that he may, on his own, pursue discretionary review or a writ of habeas corpus for an out-of-time appeal in the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 826-27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). Attorney Joseph Kyle Verret also must comply with his notification obligations by mailing a copy of the appellate records to the pro se appellant and filing a copy of that notice with the Clerk of this Court within 10 days of the date of this Order. See TEX. R. APP. P. 6.5(c).

Judge’s signature: /s/ Laura C. Higley  Acting individually Acting for the Court Date: September 13, 2018

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Juan Jose Garcia v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2018).

Juan Jose Garcia v. State (Juan Jose Garcia v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bledsoe v. State
178 S.W.3d 824 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2005)