Juan Javier Villafuerte v. the State of Texas
This text of Juan Javier Villafuerte v. the State of Texas (Juan Javier Villafuerte v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed March 9, 2023.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
NO. 14-23-00002-CR
JUAN JAVIER VILLAFUERTE, Appellant
V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the County Criminal Court at Law No. 3 Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2381872
MEMORANDUM OPINION
This is an appeal from a judgment of conviction signed September 28, 2022. Appellant timely filed a motion for new trial. Therefore, appellant’s notice of appeal was due by December 27, 2022. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a)(2).
A court of appeals may grant an extension of time if, within 15 days after the deadline for filing the notice of appeal, the party files (a) the notice of appeal in the trial court and (b) a motion to extend time in the court of appeals. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.3; see also Tex. R. App. P. 10.5(b)(2) (governing motion to extend time to file notice of appeal). The fifteenth day after December 27, 2022, was January 11, 2023. Appellant filed his notice of appeal on December 28, 2022, a date within 15 days of the due date. Appellant, however, did not file a motion to extend time to file the notice of appeal.
A notice of appeal that complies with the requirements of Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 26 is essential to vest the court of appeals with jurisdiction. Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996) (discussing former 1986 Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 41(b)). When a notice of appeal, but no motion to extend time, is filed within the 15-day period, the court of appeals can take no action other than to dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. See id.
On January 27, 2023, the parties were notified that the appeal was subject to dismissal without further notice unless either party demonstrated that the court has jurisdiction. No response has been received.
Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Chief Justice Christopher and Justices Jewell and Spain.
Do Not Publish — Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Juan Javier Villafuerte v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/juan-javier-villafuerte-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2023.