Juan Jacinto-Vazquez v. Loretta E. Lynch
This text of 684 F. App'x 584 (Juan Jacinto-Vazquez v. Loretta E. Lynch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Mexican citizen Juan Carlos Jacinto-Vazquez petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals adopting the decision of an immigration judge denying withholding of removal, and denying relief under the Convention Against Torture (CAT). 2 After careful consideration, we conclude substantial evidence supports the denials. Jacinto-Vazquez failed to establish a clear probability that his life or freedom would be threatened in Mexico because of his membership in a particular social group, and failed to establish he was entitled to CAT relief. See De Castro-Gutierrez v. Holder, 713 F.3d 375, 381-82 (8th Cir. 2013) (standard for granting CAT relief); Davila-Mejia v. Mukasey, 531 F.3d 624, 627, 629 (8th Cir. 2008) (standard of review; withholding requirements).
The petition for review is denied. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
. The rulings determining that Jacinto-Vazquez had not timely filed his asylum application or shown circumstances to excuse his untimcliness are not before us in this petition for review.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
684 F. App'x 584, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/juan-jacinto-vazquez-v-loretta-e-lynch-ca8-2017.