Juan J. Murillo D/B/A J.J. Transport and Jose Guzman Hernandez v. James Turk

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedSeptember 30, 2009
Docket04-09-00346-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Juan J. Murillo D/B/A J.J. Transport and Jose Guzman Hernandez v. James Turk (Juan J. Murillo D/B/A J.J. Transport and Jose Guzman Hernandez v. James Turk) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Juan J. Murillo D/B/A J.J. Transport and Jose Guzman Hernandez v. James Turk, (Tex. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion

i i i i i i

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-09-00346-CV

Juan J. MURILLO d/b/a J.J. Transport and Jose Guzman Hernandez, Appellants

v.

James TURK, Appellee

From the 365th Judicial District Court, Maverick County, Texas Trial Court No. 07-09-22905-MCVAJA Honorable Amado J. Abascal, III, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice Karen A. Angelini, Justice Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Delivered and Filed: September 30, 2009

JOINT MOTION TO REVERSE AND REMAND GRANTED

The parties have filed a joint motion stating they have fully resolved and settled all issues in

dispute. The parties ask that we reverse the trial court’s judgment with respect to James Turk’s

recovery against appellants, and remand the cause to the district court for rendition of judgment in

accordance with the settlement agreement. See TEX . R. APP . P. 42.1(a)(2)(B). They further request 04-09-00346-CV

that we release the obligations on the supersedeas bond and issue the mandate immediately. The

parties have agreed that each party shall bear its own costs.

We grant the motion. The judgment of the trial court, with respect to James Turk’s recovery

against appellants, is reversed and the cause is remanded to the district court for rendition of

judgment in accordance with the parties’ settlement agreement. See TEX . R. APP . P. 42.1(a)(2)(B).

The costs of this appeal shall be borne by the party that incurred them. The obligations on the

supersedeas bond are discharged, and the Clerk of this court is ordered to issue the mandate

immediately upon issuance of this opinion and judgment.

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Juan J. Murillo D/B/A J.J. Transport and Jose Guzman Hernandez v. James Turk, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/juan-j-murillo-dba-jj-transport-and-jose-guzman-he-texapp-2009.