Juan J. Chavez v. Huhtamaki, Inc.

District Court, C.D. California·Decided November 15, 2019·No. 2:19-cv-05930·Unknown

Opinion

1 || SARAH E. ROSS, Bar No. 252206 TPSANDRIAM 2 . WITTE, Bar No. 273494 awitte@hittlercom 3 ittler Mendelson, P.C. 2049 Century Park East 4 || 5th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90067.3107 5 pelephone: 310-323-0308 Fax No.: 310.553.5583 6 Attorneys for Defendant 7 | HUHTAMAKI, INC. 8 | MOON & YANG, APC Kane Moon, Bar No. 249834 9 kane.moon@moonyanglaw.com . scott Leviant, Bar No. 4 10 scott leviant(@moonyanslaw.com ilit Ter-Astvatsatryan, Bar No. 320389 11 lilitt@moonyanglaw.com . Seventh St., Suite 1880 12 || Los Angeles, CA 90017 Tel: (213) 232-3128 13 |) Fax: (213) 232-3125 14 Attomeys for Plaintiff JUAN J. CHAVEZ 15 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 17 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 18 JUAN J. CHAVEZ, individually, Case No. 2:19-cv-05930-ODW-JEM 19 || and on behalf of all others similarly situated, ASSIGNED TO HONORABLE JUDGE 20 OTIS WRIGHT Plaintiff, 21 {Discovery Document: Referred to v. agistrate Judge John E. McDermott] 22 HUHTAMAKI, INC. a Kansas STIPULATION AND [PRGPESED}— 23 corporation: and DOES ! through PROTECTIVE ORDER 24 Defendant. Complaint Filed: June 5, 2019 25 Removed: July 10, 2019 26 27 28

1 Plaintiff JUAN J. CHAVEZ (‘Plaintiff’) on the one hand, and Defendant 2 | HUHTAMAKI, INC. (“Defendant” or “Huhtamaki’) on the other, by and through 3 || their respective counsel of record, herein AGREE and STIPULATE as follows: 4], 1. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS 5 Discovery in this action is likely to involve production of confidential, 6 || proprietary or private information for which special protection from public disclosure 7 || and from use for any purpose other than pursuing this litigation may be warranted. 8 || Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to and petition the Court to enter the 9 || following Stipulated Protective Order. The parties acknowledge that this Order does 10 |) not confer blanket protections on all disclosures or responses to discovery and that the 11 |} protection it affords from public disclosure and use extends only to the limited 12 || information or items that are entitled to confidential treatment under the applicable 13 || legal principles. 14 | 2. GOOD CAUSE STATEMENT 15 This is a putative class action involving third party putative class members’ 16 || private and confidential personal and employment information, including but not 17 || limited to, putative class members’ names, addresses, telephone numbers, social 18 || security numbers, personal identifiable information, dates of employment, job titles, 19 || employment personnel files, time punches, payroll data, financial information, and 20 || other private and confidential information for which special protection from public 21 |} disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecution of this action is 22 || warranted. Such confidential and private information is otherwise generally 23 || unavailable to the public and/or is privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure 24 || under state or federal statutes, court rules, case decisions, or common law. Disclosure 25 || of the foregoing confidential information to the public without proper protection will 26 || result in serious violation of privacy of third parties and may lead to misuse of such 27 || information. Accordingly, to expedite the flow of information, to facilitate the prompt 28 || resolution of disputes over confidentiality of discovery materials, to adequately 2. STIPULATION AND PROTECTIVE ORDER

1 || protect information the parties are entitled to keep confidential, to ensure that the 2 || parties are permitted reasonable necessary uses of such material in preparation for and 3 || in the conduct of trial, to address their handling at the end of the litigation, and serve 4 || the ends of justice, a protective order for such information is justified in this matter. It 5 || is the intent of the parties that information will not be designated as confidential for 6 || tactical reasons and that nothing be so designated without a good faith belief that it 7 || has been maintained in a confidential, non-public manner, and there is good cause 8 || why it should not be part of the public record of this case. 9 3. ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF UNDER SEAL FILING PROCEDURE 10 The parties further acknowledge, as set forth in Section 13.3, below, that this 11 |) Stipulated Protective Order does not entitle them to file confidential information under 12 || seal; Local Civil Rule 79-5 sets forth the procedures that must be followed and the 13 || standards that will be applied when a party seeks permission from the court to file 14 || material under seal. There is a strong presumption that the public has a right of access 15 || to judicial proceedings and records in civil cases. In connection with non-dispositive 16 || motions, good cause must be shown to support a filing under seal. See Kamakana v. 17 || City and County of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1176 (9th Cir. 2006), Phillips v. Gen. 18 || Motors Corp., 307 F.3d 1206, 1210-11 (9th Cir. 2002), Makar-Welbon □□ Sony 19 || Electrics, Inc., 187 F.R.D. 576, 577 (E.D. Wis. 1999) (even stipulated protective 20 || orders require good cause showing), and a specific showing of good cause or 21 || compelling reasons with proper evidentiary support and legal justification, must be 22 || made with respect to Protected Material that a party seeks to file under seal. The 23 || parties’ mere designation of Disclosure or Discovery Material as CONFIDENTIAL 24 || does not—without the submission of competent evidence by declaration, establishing 25 || that the material sought to be filed under seal qualifies as confidential, privileged, or 26 || otherwise protectable—constitute good cause. 27 Further, if a party requests sealing related to a dispositive motion or trial, then 28 || compelling reasons, not only good cause, for the sealing must be shown, and the relief 3. STIPULATION AND PROTECTIVE ORDER

1 | sought shall be narrowly tailored to serve the specific interest to be protected. See 2 || Pintos v. Pacific Creditors Ass’n., 605 F.3d 665, 677-79 (9th Cir. 2010). For each 3 || item or type of information, document, or thing sought to be filed or introduced under 4 || seal, the party seeking protection must articulate compelling reasons, supported by 5 || specific facts and legal justification, for the requested sealing order. Again, competent 6 || evidence supporting the application to file documents under seal must be provided by 7 || declaration. 8 Any document that is not confidential, privileged, or otherwise protectable in its 9 || entirety will not be filed under seal if the confidential portions can be redacted. If 10 || documents can be redacted, then a redacted version for public viewing, omitting only 11 || the confidential, privileged, or otherwise protectable portions of the document, shall 12 || be filed. Any application that seeks to file documents under seal in their entirety 13 || should include an explanation of why redaction is not feasible. 14 4. DEFINITIONS 15 4.1. Action: Juan J. Chavez v. Huhtamaki, Inc., Case No. 2:19-cv-05930- 16 || ODW-JEM. 17 4.2 Challenging Party: a Party or Non-Party that challenges the designation 18 || of information or items under this Order. 19 43 “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items: information (regardless of 20 || how it is generated, stored or maintained) or tangible things that qualify for protection 21 || under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c), and as specified above in the Good 22 || Cause Statement. 23 4.4 Counsel: Outside Counsel of Record and House Counsel (as well as their 24 || support staff).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Juan J. Chavez v. Huhtamaki, Inc., (C.D. Cal. 2019).

Juan J. Chavez v. Huhtamaki, Inc. (Juan J. Chavez v. Huhtamaki, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pintos v. PACIFIC CREDITORS ASS'N
605 F.3d 665 (Ninth Circuit, 2010)
Kamakana v. City and County of Honolulu
447 F.3d 1172 (Ninth Circuit, 2006)
Makar-Wellbon v. Sony Electronics, Inc.
187 F.R.D. 576 (E.D. Wisconsin, 1999)