Juan Gilbert v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMarch 28, 2013
Docket08-11-00359-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Juan Gilbert v. State (Juan Gilbert v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Juan Gilbert v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2013).

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS

§ JUAN GILBERT, No. 08-11-00359-CR § Appellant, Appeal from § v. 372nd District Court § THE STATE OF TEXAS, of Tarrant County, Texas § Appellee. (TC # 1002470D) §

JUDGMENT

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no error in the

judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below. This decision shall be certified

below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 28TH DAY OF MARCH, 2013.

ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Chief Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rivera, and Rodriguez, JJ. COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS

§ JUAN GILBERT, No. 08-11-00359-CR § Appellant, Appeal from § v. 372nd District Court § THE STATE OF TEXAS, of Tarrant County, Texas § Appellee. (TC # 1002470D) §

RECORD RETENTION STATEMENT:

Pursuant to the Supreme Court order regarding disposition of court documents in this case, it is determined that this record should be:

x NOT PERMANENTLY PRESERVED (NO HISTORICAL VALUE)

PERMANENTLY PRESERVED (PERMANENTLY RETAIN--HAS HISTORICAL VALUE)

PERMANENTLY RETAINED CRIMINAL CASE (sentence over 20 years)

_______________________________________________ ____3/28/13____________ Judge=s Signature Date

Date Destroyed: ______________________________ per Order dated _____________ COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS

§ JUAN GILBERT, No. 08-11-00359-CR § Appellant, Appeal from § v. 372nd District Court § THE STATE OF TEXAS, of Tarrant County, Texas § Appellee. (TC # 1002470D) §

ORDER

On this the 28th day of March, 2013, came on to be heard Kimberly Campbell’s motion

to withdraw. Having determined that counsel has met the requirements of Anders v. California,

386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493, reh. denied, 388 U.S. 924, 87 S.Ct. 2094, 18

L.Ed.2d 1377 (1967) and TEX.R.APP.P. 6.5, we grant the motion to withdraw on the following

terms and conditions:

Counsel is directed to (1) forward to Appellant this order and the Court’=s opinion and

judgment issued this same day in this cause; (2) notify Appellant of the availability of

discretionary review; and (3) notify Appellant of the appellate deadlines applicable to

discretionary review.

________________________________________________ ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Chief Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rivera, and Rodriguez, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
O'Bryan v. Chandler
388 U.S. 904 (Supreme Court, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Juan Gilbert v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/juan-gilbert-v-state-texapp-2013.