Juan Gamez, Jr. v. the State of Texas
This text of Juan Gamez, Jr. v. the State of Texas (Juan Gamez, Jr. v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-25-00389-CR
Juan Gamez, Jr., Appellant
v.
The State of Texas, Appellee
FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 9 OF TRAVIS COUNTY NO. C-1-CR-24-207353, THE HONORABLE KIM WILLIAMS, JUDGE PRESIDING
MEMORANDUM OPINION
A jury found appellant Juan Gamez, Jr. guilty of indecent exposure, a class B
misdemeanor. See Tex. Penal Code § 21.08. The trial court sentenced appellant to one hundred
days’ confinement in the Travis County Jail.
Appellant’s court-appointed attorney has filed a motion to withdraw supported by
a brief concluding that the appeal is frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the
requirements of Anders v. California by presenting a professional evaluation of the record
demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. See 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967);
Garner v. State, 300 S.W.3d 763, 766 (Tex. Crim. App. 2009); see also Penson v. Ohio,
488 U.S. 75, 81–82 (1988). Appellant’s counsel has certified to this Court that he sent copies of
the motion and brief to appellant, advised appellant of his right to examine the appellate record
and file a pro se response, and provided a motion to assist appellant in obtaining the record. See Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313, 319–20 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014); see also Anders, 386 U.S. at
744. To date, no pro se response has been filed.
We have conducted an independent review of the record, including the record of
the proceedings below and appellate counsel’s brief, and find no reversible error. See Anders,
386 U.S. at 744; Garner, 300 S.W.3d at 766; Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 826–27 (Tex.
Crim. App. 2005). We agree with counsel that the record presents no arguably meritorious
grounds for review, and the appeal is frivolous.
Counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted. The trial court’s judgment of
conviction is affirmed.
__________________________________________ Maggie Ellis, Justice
Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Crump, and Ellis
Affirmed
Filed: September 30, 2025
Do Not Publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Juan Gamez, Jr. v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/juan-gamez-jr-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2025.