JUAN FRANCISCO VEGA v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA
Opinion
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed November 2, 2022. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D22-1320 Lower Tribunal Nos. 09-50922, F08-34057, F85-32539, F85-32540, F85-32541, & F86-4671 ________________
Juan Francisco Vega, Petitioner,
vs.
The State of Florida, et al., Respondents.
A Case of Original Jurisdiction—Petition for Belated Appeal.
Juan Francisco Vega, in proper person.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Linda Katz, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent The State of Florida.
Before SCALES, MILLER and BOKOR, JJ.
PER CURIAM. Juan Francisco Vega petitions for belated appeal of a trial court order
finding no probable cause to release Vega from his involuntary civil
commitment under the Jimmy Ryce Act. See § 394.918(1), Fla. Stat. (2022).
Because the instant proceedings are civil in nature, Vega is not entitled to
relief in this Court under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(c). See
In re Commitment of May, 975 So. 2d 579, 580-81 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008).
Further, because Vega’s “petition presents a factual issue about whether he
timely instructed his attorney to file an appeal,” Vega must first file a petition
for writ of habeas corpus in the trial court “so that the trial court may resolve
the factual issues that may entitle him to a belated appeal” in this Court. Id.
at 581-82.
Accordingly, we dismiss the instant petition for lack of jurisdiction,
without prejudice to Vegas filing a petition for writ of habeas corpus in the
trial court.
Petition dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
JUAN FRANCISCO VEGA v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA (JUAN FRANCISCO VEGA v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.