Juan Enriquez v. Amalia Rodriguez-Mendoza

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided February 1, 2013·No. 03-12-00220-CV·Published

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED FEBRUARY 1, 2013

NO. 03-12-00220-CV

Juan Enriquez, Appellant

v.

Amalia Rodriguez-Mendoza, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 126TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE JONES, JUSTICES GOODWIN AND FIELD AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE JONES

THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on the record of the court below, and the same being

considered, it is the opinion of this Court that there was no error requiring reversal in the trial

court’s judgment: IT IS THEREFORE considered, adjudged and ordered that the trial court’s

judgment is in all things affirmed. It is FURTHER ordered that it appearing that the appellant

is indigent and unable to pay costs, that no adjudication as to costs is made; and that this decision

be certified below for observance.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Juan Enriquez v. Amalia Rodriguez-Mendoza, (Tex. Ct. App. 2013).

Juan Enriquez v. Amalia Rodriguez-Mendoza (Juan Enriquez v. Amalia Rodriguez-Mendoza) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.