Juan Enriquez v. Amalia Rodriguez-Mendoza
This text of Juan Enriquez v. Amalia Rodriguez-Mendoza (Juan Enriquez v. Amalia Rodriguez-Mendoza) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
JUDGMENT RENDERED FEBRUARY 1, 2013
NO. 03-12-00220-CV
Juan Enriquez, Appellant
v.
Amalia Rodriguez-Mendoza, Appellee
APPEAL FROM THE 126TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE JONES, JUSTICES GOODWIN AND FIELD AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE JONES
THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on the record of the court below, and the same being
considered, it is the opinion of this Court that there was no error requiring reversal in the trial
court’s judgment: IT IS THEREFORE considered, adjudged and ordered that the trial court’s
judgment is in all things affirmed. It is FURTHER ordered that it appearing that the appellant
is indigent and unable to pay costs, that no adjudication as to costs is made; and that this decision
be certified below for observance.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Juan Enriquez v. Amalia Rodriguez-Mendoza, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/juan-enriquez-v-amalia-rodriguez-mendoza-texapp-2013.