Juan Daniel Cano v. State

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Juan Daniel Cano v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2012 Tex. App. LEXIS 2478
Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided May 10, 2012·No. 07-11-00143-CR·Published

Opinion

NO. 07-12-00075-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL C

MAY 10, 2012

IN THE MATTER OF THE MARRIAGE OF PABLO CHAVEZ AND ARELLI ROJO AND IN THE INTEREST OF U.C. AND J.C., CHILDREN

FROM THE 31ST DISTRICT COURT OF HEMPHILL COUNTY;

NO. 6660; HONORABLE STEVEN RAY EMMERT, JUDGE

Before QUINN, C.J., and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ.

ON MOTION TO DISMISS

Appellant, Arelli Rojo, has informed this Court by motion to dismiss this appeal

that she no longer desires to pursue the appeal. No decision of this Court having been

delivered to date, we grant the motion. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. See TEX.

R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1). As there was no contrary agreement of the parties included in

appellant’s motion, all costs related to this appeal are assessed against appellant. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(d). If dismissal will prevent appellee from seeking relief to which he

would otherwise be entitled, the Court directs appellee to file a timely motion for

rehearing. No motion for rehearing from appellant will be entertained.

Mackey K. Hancock Justice

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Juan Daniel Cano v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2012).

Juan Daniel Cano v. State (Juan Daniel Cano v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.