Juan Daniel Cano v. State
Opinion
NO. 07-12-00075-CV
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
AT AMARILLO
PANEL C
MAY 10, 2012
IN THE MATTER OF THE MARRIAGE OF PABLO CHAVEZ AND ARELLI ROJO AND IN THE INTEREST OF U.C. AND J.C., CHILDREN
FROM THE 31ST DISTRICT COURT OF HEMPHILL COUNTY;
NO. 6660; HONORABLE STEVEN RAY EMMERT, JUDGE
Before QUINN, C.J., and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ.
ON MOTION TO DISMISS
Appellant, Arelli Rojo, has informed this Court by motion to dismiss this appeal
that she no longer desires to pursue the appeal. No decision of this Court having been
delivered to date, we grant the motion. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. See TEX.
R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1). As there was no contrary agreement of the parties included in
appellant’s motion, all costs related to this appeal are assessed against appellant. See
TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(d). If dismissal will prevent appellee from seeking relief to which he
would otherwise be entitled, the Court directs appellee to file a timely motion for
rehearing. No motion for rehearing from appellant will be entertained.
Mackey K. Hancock Justice
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Juan Daniel Cano v. State (Juan Daniel Cano v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.