Juan Cortez v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMay 25, 2006
Docket13-05-00770-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Juan Cortez v. State (Juan Cortez v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Juan Cortez v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2006).

Opinion

                              NUMBER 13-05-770-CR

                                 COURT OF APPEALS

                     THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                         CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________  ______

JUAN CORTEZ,                                                                                 Appellant,

                                                             v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,                                                                    Appellee.

_________________________________________________________  _________

                              On appeal from the 36th District Court

                                        of Aransas County, Texas.

_________________________________________________________  _________

                               MEMORANDUM OPINION

                      Before Justices Rodriguez, Castillo, and Garza

                                 Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, JUAN CORTEZ, attempts to appeal a conviction for possession of cocaine.  The trial court has certified that this Ais a plea-bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal.@  See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2).


On January 20, 2006, this Court notified appellant=s counsel of the trial court=s certification and ordered counsel to: (1) review the record; (2) determine whether appellant has a right to appeal; and (3) forward to this Court, by letter, counsel=s findings as to whether appellant has a right to appeal, or, alternatively, advise this Court as to the existence of any amended certification.

On April 10, 2006, counsel filed a letter brief with this Court.  Counsel=s response does not establish (1) that the certification currently on file with this Court is incorrect or (2) that appellant otherwise has a right to appeal. 

The Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provide that an appeal must be dismissed if the trial court=s certification does not show that the defendant has the right of appeal.  Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d); see Tex. R. App. P. 37.1, 44.3, 44.4. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed.  Any pending motions are denied as moot.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish. 

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).

Memorandum Opinion delivered and

filed this the 25th day of May, 2006.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Juan Cortez v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/juan-cortez-v-state-texapp-2006.