Juan Cano Hernandez v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJune 12, 2003
Docket02-03-00165-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Juan Cano Hernandez v. State (Juan Cano Hernandez v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Juan Cano Hernandez v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2003).

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS
FORT WORTH

NO. 2-03-165-CR

 

JUAN CANO HERNANDEZ                                                            APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS                                                                     STATE

------------

FROM THE 211
TH DISTRICT COURT OF DENTON COUNTY

MEMORANDUM OPINION(1)

        On December 5, 2002, after a jury trial, Appellant Juan Cano Hernandez was convicted of aggravated kidnapping and sentenced to twenty years' confinement. He timely filed a motion for new trial on January 3, 2003. His notice of appeal was therefore due on March 5, 2003.(2) Appellant did not file his notice of appeal until April 22, 2003; thus, it was untimely.(3)

        Because the notice of appeal was untimely, we sent a letter to Appellant on May 2, 2003, requesting a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal, as it appeared we lacked jurisdiction.(4) Appellant did not respond to this request.

        A notice of appeal that complies with the requirements of rule 26 is essential to vest this court with jurisdiction.(5) The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals has expressly held that without a timely filed notice of appeal or motion for extension of time, we cannot exercise jurisdiction over an appeal.(6)

        Because Appellant's notice of appeal was untimely filed, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction.(7)

 

                                                            PER CURIAM

PANEL D: DAUPHINOT, HOLMAN, and GARDNER, JJ.

DO NOT PUBLISH
Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED: June 12, 2003


1.

See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

2. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a)(2).

3. Id.

4. See Tex. R. App. P. 44.3.

5. Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a)(2); see Slaton v. State, 981 S.W.2d 208, 210 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998); York v. State, 69 S.W.3d 792, 794 n.5 (Tex. App.--Fort Worth 2002, no pet.).

6. Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996); see also Slaton, 981 S.W.2d at 210.

7. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a)(2); Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(f).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Slaton v. State
981 S.W.2d 208 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1998)
Olivo v. State
918 S.W.2d 519 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1996)
York v. State
69 S.W.3d 792 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Juan Cano Hernandez v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/juan-cano-hernandez-v-state-texapp-2003.