Juan Bella and Sonya Bella v. Juan R. Caballero and Sylvia Caballero

Court of Appeals of Texas

Juan Bella and Sonya Bella v. Juan R. Caballero and Sylvia Caballero

DecidedJune 23, 2011

Docket13-10-00388-CV

StatusPublished

This text of Juan Bella and Sonya Bella v. Juan R. Caballero and Sylvia Caballero (Juan Bella and Sonya Bella v. Juan R. Caballero and Sylvia Caballero) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Juan Bella and Sonya Bella v. Juan R. Caballero and Sylvia Caballero, (Tex. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

NUMBER 13-10-00388-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________

JUAN BELLA AND SONYA BELLA, APPELLANTS,

v.

JUAN R. CABALLERO AND SYLVIA CABALLERO, APPELLEES.

On appeal from the County Court

of Willacy County, Texas.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Garza, Vela, and Perkes

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

The appellants’ brief in the above cause was due on February 7, 2011. On March 3, 2011, the Clerk of the Court notified pro se appellant Juan Bella that the brief had not been filed and that the appeal was subject to dismissal for want of prosecution under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.8(a)(1), unless within ten days from the date of receipt of this letter, appellant reasonably explained the failure and the appellee was not significantly injured by the appellant's failure to timely file a brief.

On April 29, 2011, the Clerk of the Court notified pro se appellant Sonya Bella that the brief had not been filed and that the appeal was subject to dismissal for want of prosecution under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.8(a)(1), unless within ten days from the date of receipt of this letter, appellant reasonably explained the failure and the appellee was not significantly injured by the appellant's failure to timely file a brief.

To date, no response has been received from appellants. Appellants have failed to either reasonably explain their failure to file a brief, file a motion for extension of time to file the brief, or file the brief. Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b).

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the

23rd day of June, 2011.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

NUMBER 13-10-00388-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________

JUAN BELLA AND SONYA BELLA, APPELLANTS,

v.

JUAN R. CABALLERO AND SYLVIA CABALLERO, APPELLEES.

On appeal from the County Court

of Willacy County, Texas.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Garza, Vela, and Perkes

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

The appellants’ brief in the above cause was due on February 7, 2011. On March 3, 2011, the Clerk of the Court notified pro se appellant Juan Bella that the brief had not been filed and that the appeal was subject to dismissal for want of prosecution under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.8(a)(1), unless within ten days from the date of receipt of this letter, appellant reasonably explained the failure and the appellee was not significantly injured by the appellant's failure to timely file a brief.

On April 29, 2011, the Clerk of the Court notified pro se appellant Sonya Bella that the brief had not been filed and that the appeal was subject to dismissal for want of prosecution under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.8(a)(1), unless within ten days from the date of receipt of this letter, appellant reasonably explained the failure and the appellee was not significantly injured by the appellant's failure to timely file a brief.

To date, no response has been received from appellants. Appellants have failed to either reasonably explain their failure to file a brief, file a motion for extension of time to file the brief, or file the brief. Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b).

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the

23rd day of June, 2011.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Juan Bella and Sonya Bella v. Juan R. Caballero and Sylvia Caballero, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/juan-bella-and-sonya-bella-v-juan-r-caballero-and--texapp-2011.