Juan Araujo v. State
This text of Juan Araujo v. State (Juan Araujo v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Phil Hardberger, Chief Justice
Tom Rickhoff, Justice
Alma L. López, Justice
Delivered and Filed: September 23, 1998
DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION
The trial court imposed sentence in each of these causes on May 5, 1998. Because appellant did not file a motion for new trial, the notice of appeal in each cause was due to be filed on June 4, 1998. Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a)(1). A motion for extension of time to file the notice of appeal was due on June 19, 1998. Tex. R. App. P. 26.3. Appellant filed his notice of appeal in each appeal on July 29, 1998. Appellant did not file a motion for extension of time.
Appellant has not responded to this court's order for appellant to show cause why these appeals should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. This court lacks jurisdiction over an appeal of a criminal conviction in the absence of a timely, written notice of appeal. See Shute v. State, 744 S.W.2d 96, 97 (Tex. Crim. App. 1988); see also Ater v. Eighth Court of Appeals, 802 S.W.2d 241 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991)(out-of-time appeal from final felony conviction may be sought by filing a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure). The appeals are dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
PER CURIAM
DO NOT PUBLISH
4th Court of Appeals Opinions
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Juan Araujo v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/juan-araujo-v-state-texapp-1998.