Juan A. Porras v. Larry Warner

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedApril 10, 2008
Docket13-07-00499-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Juan A. Porras v. Larry Warner (Juan A. Porras v. Larry Warner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Juan A. Porras v. Larry Warner, (Tex. Ct. App. 2008).

Opinion

NUMBER 13-07-00499-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG ______________________________________________________________

JUAN A. PORRAS, Appellant,

v.

LARRY WARNER, Appellee. _____________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the 107th District Court of Cameron County, Texas. ______________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Garza and Vela Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, Juan A. Porras, perfected an appeal from a judgment rendered against

him in favor of appellee, Larry Warner, in a legal malpractice action. On September 7,

2007, the Clerk of this Court notified appellant that the clerk's record in the above cause

was originally due on August 27, 2007, and that the deputy district clerk, Laura Cisneros, had notified this Court that appellant failed to make arrangements for payment of the

clerk's record. The Clerk of this Court notified appellant of this defect so that steps could

be taken to correct the defect, if it could be done. See TEX . R. APP. P. 37.3, 42.3(b),(c).

Appellant was advised that, if the defect was not corrected within ten days from the

date of receipt of this notice, the appeal would be dismissed for want of prosecution.

Appellant failed to respond to the Court’s notice, and has further failed to make

arrangements to pay for the reporter’s record in this cause..

The Court, having considered the documents on file, is of the opinion that the

appeal should be dismissed. See id. 37.3(b), 42.3(b),(c).

Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED.

PER CURIAM

Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed this the 10th day of April, 2008.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Juan A. Porras v. Larry Warner, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/juan-a-porras-v-larry-warner-texapp-2008.