Jtv v. Mal
This text of 363 S.W.3d 383 (Jtv v. Mal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
J.T.V., Respondent,
v.
M.A.L., Appellant.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
Kruse, Reinker & Hamilton, LLC, Robert N. Hamilton, Jennifer R. Piper, John R. Fenley, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant.
The Marks Law Firm, LLC, Jonathan D. Marks, Creve Coeur, MO, for Respondent.
Before ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., P.J, MARY K. HOFF, J., and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J.
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
M.A.L. appeals from the judgment granting J.T.V.'s motion to modify child support and denying M.A.L.'s motion to dismiss and motion to modify child support. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal, and find the claims of error to be without merit. An extended opinion would have no precedential value or serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
363 S.W.3d 383, 2012 WL 549166, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 200, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jtv-v-mal-moctapp-2012.