JT Magen & Co. v. Toscorp, Inc.
This text of 272 A.D.2d 202 (JT Magen & Co. v. Toscorp, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Franklin Weissberg, J.), entered April 2, 1999, which, upon plaintiffs motion for summary judgment in lieu of complaint, granted defendants’ cross motion to compel arbitration of whether plaintiff is entitled to recover on the checks in issue, unanimously affirmed, with costs.
Arbitration was properly compelled since the stopped checks in issue were admittedly given by defendants to plaintiff as final payment for construction work performed pursuant to a contract that conditioned final payment upon plaintiffs compliance with the contract and contained a broad arbitration clause covering any controversy arising out of or related to the contract or its breach. We reject plaintiffs argument that defendants’ claims of noncompliant performance should be severed and submitted to arbitration, and judicial relief accorded on the checks since they do not themselves contain an arbitration clause, or refer to any agreement that contains an arbitration clause, and are otherwise on their face straightforward instruments for the payment of money only (see, Rosenblum v Steiner, 43 NY2d 896; Muh v Risher, 38 NY2d 441). Concur — Williams, J. P., Tom, Mazzarelli and Buckley, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
272 A.D.2d 202, 707 N.Y.S.2d 624, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5624, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jt-magen-co-v-toscorp-inc-nyappdiv-2000.