JSBarkats PLLC v. Response Scientific Inc.

2017 NY Slip Op 3142, 149 A.D.3d 652, 50 N.Y.S.3d 873
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 25, 2017·No. 3845 159434/14·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Eileen A. Rakower, J.), entered on or about May 6, 2016, which denied defendants’ motion to compel arbitration, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The motion court properly decided the issue of waiver (see Cusimano v Schnurr, 26 NY3d 391, 401 n 3 [2015]) and properly determined that defendants had waived arbitration. Defendants’ participation in the lawsuit, in both state and federal court, for approximately 11 months before moving to compel arbitration manifested an affirmative acceptance of the judicial forum and caused plaintiff unnecessary delay and expense (see id. at 400-401; see also De Sapio v Kohlmeyer, 35 NY2d 402, 405 [1974]; Thyssen, Inc. v Calypso Shipping Corp., S.A., 310 F3d 102, 105 [2d Cir 2002], cert denied 538 US 922 [2003]).

We have considered defendants’ remaining arguments and find them unavailing.

Concur — Tom, J.P., Mazzarelli, Andrias, Manzanet-Daniels and Webber, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

JSBarkats PLLC v. Response Scientific Inc., 2017 NY Slip Op 3142, 149 A.D.3d 652, 50 N.Y.S.3d 873 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2017).

2017 NY Slip Op 3142 (JSBarkats PLLC v. Response Scientific Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hoffman v. AKT in Motion, Inc.
186 N.Y.S.3d 214 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2023)
Wallace v. Tri-Med Home Care Servs., Inc.
2021 NY Slip Op 00821 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2021)