J.S. v. S.R.

122 So. 3d 998, 2013 WL 5629450, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 16486
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 16, 2013
DocketNo. 1D13-2738
StatusPublished

This text of 122 So. 3d 998 (J.S. v. S.R.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
J.S. v. S.R., 122 So. 3d 998, 2013 WL 5629450, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 16486 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).

Opinion

WOLF, J.

Appellant, the father, appeals from an order on his motion seeking enforcement of a facilitated visitation agreement. The father argues the trial court’s modification of his visitation schedule, in the absence of pleadings requesting such modification, was a denial of due process. We agree. See Neumann v. Neumann, 857 So.2d 372, 373 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003) (“It is well settled that an order adjudicating issues not presented by the pleadings, noticed to the parties, or litigated below denies fundamental due process.”).

We therefore reverse. The visitation schedule in place at the time the father filed his motion for enforcement is restored. See id.

REVERSED.

LEWIS, C.J., and MAKAR, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Neumann v. Neumann
857 So. 2d 372 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
122 So. 3d 998, 2013 WL 5629450, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 16486, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/js-v-sr-fladistctapp-2013.