J.S. v. A.M.

Missouri Court of Appeals

J.S. v. A.M.

533 S.W.3d 268

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 14, 2017·No. No. ED 105089·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

J.S. appeals from the judgment entered by the Circuit Court of St. Louis County denying her petition for an adult order of protection against A.M. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential or precedential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the Judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM

J.S. appeals from the judgment entered by the Circuit Court of St. Louis County denying her petition for an adult order of protection against A.M. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential or precedential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the Judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

J.S. v. A.M., 533 S.W.3d 268 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

533 S.W.3d 268 (J.S. v. A.M.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.