J.R.F. v. State

430 So. 2d 980, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 22438
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 10, 1983
DocketNo. 82-1069
StatusPublished

This text of 430 So. 2d 980 (J.R.F. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
J.R.F. v. State, 430 So. 2d 980, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 22438 (Fla. Ct. App. 1983).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant was adjudicated delinquent after the trial court found him guilty of the crime of robbery. The sole point on appeal challenges the sufficiency of the evidence identifying the appellant as the person who committed the crime. The appellant’s position is that because he had seven witnesses testifying that he was elsewhere when the crime was committed, against the sole testimony of the victim identifying him as the robber, the evidence was insufficient to sustain the conviction. This type of argument was rejected in State v. Sebastian, 171 So.2d 893 (Fla.1965). Therefore the order appealed herein is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Sebastian
171 So. 2d 893 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1965)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
430 So. 2d 980, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 22438, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jrf-v-state-fladistctapp-1983.