J.R. v. State

739 So. 2d 743, 1999 WL 741051
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 17, 1999·No. No. 98-3043·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm. The record contains sufficient evidence to satisfy the requirements of Faison v. State, 426 So.2d 963 (Fla.1983). We likewise hold that appellant has failed to demonstrate reversible error in the other points raised on appeal. However, we must remand to correct the disposition order to reflect that appellant did not enter a guilty plea, but was sentenced after an adjudicatory hearing.

AFFIRMED and REMANDED with directions.

DELL, STONE and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

J.R. v. State, 739 So. 2d 743, 1999 WL 741051 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

739 So. 2d 743 (J.R. v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Faison v. State
426 So. 2d 963 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1983)