J.R. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

J.R. v. State

592 So. 2d 1253, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 908, 1992 WL 20023

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 5, 1992

DocketNo. 90-02438

StatusPublished

This text of 592 So. 2d 1253 (J.R. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

J.R. v. State, 592 So. 2d 1253, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 908, 1992 WL 20023 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Defendant contends, and the state correctly concedes, that the trial court erred in [1254]*1254ordering her to pay restitution for damages that were not proven to be directly or indirectly related to the offenses to which she pleaded guilty. § 775.089(l)(a), Fla.Stat. (1989); State v. Williams, 520 So.2d 276 (Fla.1988). Accordingly, we reverse the restitution order and remand for further proceedings consistent with section 775.-089(l)(a).

FRANK, A.C.J., and PATTERSON and ALTENBERND, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Defendant contends, and the state correctly concedes, that the trial court erred in [1254]*1254ordering her to pay restitution for damages that were not proven to be directly or indirectly related to the offenses to which she pleaded guilty. § 775.089(l)(a), Fla.Stat. (1989); State v. Williams, 520 So.2d 276 (Fla.1988). Accordingly, we reverse the restitution order and remand for further proceedings consistent with section 775.-089(l)(a).

FRANK, A.C.J., and PATTERSON and ALTENBERND, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

592 So. 2d 1253, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 908, 1992 WL 20023, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jr-v-state-fladistctapp-1992.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack