J.R. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

J.R. v. State

592 So. 2d 1253, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 908, 1992 WL 20023

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in J.R. v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 11974 →

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 5, 1992·No. No. 90-02438·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Defendant contends, and the state correctly concedes, that the trial court erred in [1254]*1254ordering her to pay restitution for damages that were not proven to be directly or indirectly related to the offenses to which she pleaded guilty. § 775.089(l)(a), Fla.Stat. (1989); State v. Williams, 520 So.2d 276 (Fla.1988). Accordingly, we reverse the restitution order and remand for further proceedings consistent with section 775.-089(l)(a).

FRANK, A.C.J., and PATTERSON and ALTENBERND, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Defendant contends, and the state correctly concedes, that the trial court erred in [1254]*1254ordering her to pay restitution for damages that were not proven to be directly or indirectly related to the offenses to which she pleaded guilty. § 775.089(l)(a), Fla.Stat. (1989); State v. Williams, 520 So.2d 276 (Fla.1988). Accordingly, we reverse the restitution order and remand for further proceedings consistent with section 775.-089(l)(a).

FRANK, A.C.J., and PATTERSON and ALTENBERND, JJ., concur.

J.R. v. State, 592 So. 2d 1253, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 908, 1992 WL 20023 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

592 So. 2d 1253 (J.R. v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related