J.R. v. San Marcos Unified School District

District Court, S.D. California·Decided October 12, 2021·No. 3:21-cv-01752·Unknown

Opinion

J.R., by and through her Guardians ad Case No.: 21-CV-1752 JLS (AGS) Litem; NICOLE REED; and RONALD REED, ORDER SUA SPONTE STRIKING Plaintiffs, GUARDIANS AD LITEM v. (ECF No. 1-2) SAN MARCOS UNIFIED SCHOOL Defendant. Presently before the Court is minor Plaintiff J.R.’s ex parte Petition to appoint her parents, Nicole Reed and Ronald Reed, as Guardians ad Litem (ECF No. 1-2). Plaintiff’s Petition contains the full name of the minor Plaintiff. Pursuant to this Court’s General Order No. 514, “counsel or parties shall be required to remove or redact the . . . Names of Minor Children. If the involvement of a minor child must be mentioned, only the initials of that child should be used.” See also Fotinos v. Fotinos, No. C 12-953 CW, 2014 WL 546083, at *5 (N.D. Cal. Feb. 7, 2014), aff’d, 644 F. App’x 793 (9th Cir. 2016) (striking filings that improperly included minor child’s name). Accordingly, the Court sua sponte /// /// STRIKES the Petition. Plaintiff may file a redacted version of the Petition within seven days of the date of this order. Dated: October 12, 2021 tt jen Janis L. Sammartino United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

J.R. v. San Marcos Unified School District, (S.D. Cal. 2021).

J.R. v. San Marcos Unified School District (J.R. v. San Marcos Unified School District) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Michele Fotinos v. John Fotinos
644 F. App'x 793 (Ninth Circuit, 2016)